Speaking the name whose name I shall not mention

When I am thinking of the current starter at short stop for the Red Sox I am reminding of the hysterical scene from Scary Movie 4 where in the spoof of the Village they ask, if we speak of those to whom we do not mention then aren't we discussing those to whom we do not speak about? I feel that way about a certain shortstop that the Red Sox were stupid enough to offer a big fat contract too prior to 2007. Needless to say, he is terrible beyond words and yet again his poor baseball playing cost the Red Sox another game last night. Why do the Red Sox think that any player who plays well AGAINST them will play well FOR them? This is a tired old routine which has been proven oh so wrong over the years.

I am glad to see that the crooks on Beacon Hill are trying to get rid of two of the hack holiday's, Bunker Hill Day and Evacuation Day. Now I am a history lover and have no doubt of the importance of these days but understand that fat cat politicians want to make sure that their idiot cousins, who could not work as greeters at Wal-Mart get more for less than those of us idiots who support their quasi-welfare lifestyle. If anyone wants to see what a Socialist state looks like, check out Beacon Hill. Except in Europe, I think they might want you to actually put in some work? But I do have an idea. Any state work who wants the day off must be able to answer two questions 1) Where was the Battle of Bunker Hill Fought on? 2) Why did the British evacuation Boston on March 17?

Today looks like laundry and maybe a Sox game. I am keeping my fingers crossed. Of course if he whose name we can not mention is playing I may end up incarcerated after the game!